Internal threats and how the government deals with them
Terrorism, insurgency and the Naxalite movement have been serious internal threats. The government meets them with diplomacy, law and order action and faster development.
Protest is not a threat; violence is
Protests, strikes and bandhs are a normal part of democracy. People use them to draw the government's attention to their demands, and the police handle most such law and order problems locally. Terrorism, insurgency and the Naxalite movement are different. They use organised violence and are far more serious threats to peace and security.
Terrorism
- There is no agreed definition of terrorism. In general it is a criminal act meant to cause dramatic, deadly harm to civilians and create fear. Its aim is usually political or ideological.
- No political, religious, ethnic or other reason can justify it. UN Security Council Resolution 1566 (2004) takes the same view.
- Methods: bomb blasts, firing in crowded places, hijacking planes and taking hostages to force the government to accept demands.
- The attack on Mumbai on 26 November 2008, known as 26/11, was one of the worst.
- The lesson says those involved have included foreigners, and Indian youth who were indoctrinated (taught extreme ideas) and trained abroad.
Insurgency
- Insurgency is an armed rebellion against the government.
- Two kinds: movements with political motives, and movements for social and economic justice.
- The lesson names armed separatist groups in Jammu and Kashmir and Assam, and militant groups in Arunachal Pradesh, Manipur, Mizoram, Nagaland and Tripura.
- Some groups seek secession (breaking away from India). Many are driven by dissatisfaction with their conditions.
- Their members are Indians, but some groups get support from across the border and from international terrorist groups.
The Naxalite movement: how it grew
The order follows your lesson. The number of affected districts has fallen sharply in recent years, so check recent official figures.
- 1967At Naxalbari in West Bengal, a tribal youth with a court order to plough his land was attacked by a landlord's men. Peasants rose up, led by Charu Mazumdar and Kanu Sanyal.
- Phase oneThe rising spread in West Bengal. It was put down by force, along with some land reforms by the state government.
- Phase twoIt spread to nine states, including Bihar, Jharkhand, Odisha, Chhattisgarh, Andhra Pradesh and Maharashtra, mostly in tribal and forest areas.
- MethodsAttacks on public property, officials and security forces; kangaroo courts (illegal courts of their own); forced levies (illegal taxes) on contractors and businesses; opposition to roads and development in forests.
- Root causeDiscontent born of long social discrimination and economic deprivation, felt most in some tribal and Dalit (Scheduled Caste) communities that have not yet fully gained from development.
How the government responds
| Threat | Strategy in the lesson |
|---|---|
| Terrorism | Supports all nations' efforts against terrorism and seeks their help after attacks; uses diplomacy to press neighbouring countries to stop any support reaching terrorist groups |
| Insurgency with political aims | Tackled partly diplomatically: treaties with Myanmar and Bangladesh to stop help reaching insurgents from there, and international pressure on Pakistan to stop such help too |
| Naxalite movement | At first treated by states as a law and order problem; now seen as having deep socio-economic roots, so the focus is on faster development of the areas and bringing youth into the mainstream |
Activity: views on dealing with Naxalism
- 1Write two statements. (1) The government should crush the movement by force alone. (2) The government should have a national policy that stops the violence, speeds up development and invites Naxalites to give up violence.
- 2Ask at least five people, such as friends, family or teachers, whether they agree or disagree with each statement, and why.
- 3Record their reasons in a table, one row per person for each statement.
- 4Compare the reasons. Note which answers deal with root causes, such as deprivation, and which deal only with the violence.
- 5Write a short note on how you would solve the problem, using the lesson's point that it has deep socio-economic roots.
Roads, mobile towers, schools and ration shops reaching remote forest villages are part of the response to Naxalism. Security checks at airports and stations, and alert citizens reporting unattended bags, help prevent terrorist attacks.
6 marks: “What are the major internal threats to peace and security in India? How has the government dealt with them?” Opening: India faces terrorism, insurgency and the Naxalite movement. Points: (1) terrorism: criminal violence against civilians to spread fear, such as 26/11; (2) insurgency: armed rebellion with political or socio-economic aims, as in Jammu and Kashmir and the North-East; (3) the Naxalite movement from Naxalbari, 1967, rooted in deprivation; (4) against terrorism: international cooperation and diplomacy; (5) against insurgency: treaties with Myanmar and Bangladesh; (6) against Naxalism: development and bringing youth into the mainstream. Close: firm action must go with development.
2 marks: “What is insurgency? Name its two types.” Insurgency is an armed rebellion against the government. Its two types are movements with political motives and movements for social and economic justice.
1 marks: “Where and when did the Naxalite movement begin?” At Naxalbari, West Bengal, in 1967.
Three threats, T-I-N: Terrorism, Insurgency, Naxalism. Three answers, D-L-D: Diplomacy, Law and order, Development.