haya.Learning made clear
Unit III · Consumer behaviour and production decisions
9 min readConcept sheetOften a 5-mark calculation or a 10-mark essay

Diminishing marginal utility and consumer equilibrium

Each extra unit gives less extra satisfaction. A consumer is in equilibrium when the last rupee spent on every good gives the same marginal utility.

Total utility (TU)Satisfaction from all units consumed
Marginal utility (MU)Extra satisfaction from one more unit
Two-good equilibriumMUx ÷ Px = MUy ÷ Py
ApproachCardinal (utility measured in utils)

The cardinal utility approach

Utility is the satisfaction a consumer gets from a good. The cardinal approach (associated with Alfred Marshall) assumes utility can be measured in units called utils. It also assumes a rational consumer who wants maximum satisfaction from a limited income, and a constant marginal utility of money. Total utility (TU) is the satisfaction from all units consumed. Marginal utility (MU) is the change in TU from one more unit: MU = ΔTU ÷ ΔQ. The law of diminishing marginal utility says that as a person consumes more units of a good, in a short period and with tastes unchanged, the MU of each extra unit falls.

Worked example 1: diminishing marginal utility

Problem

A worker drinks cups of plain tea during a long shift. Total utility after 0 to 7 cups is: 0, 20, 36, 48, 56, 60, 60, 56 utils. Find the marginal utility of each cup.

Working
  1. Cup 1: 20 − 0 = 20. Cup 2: 36 − 20 = 16. Cup 3: 48 − 36 = 12.
  2. Cup 4: 56 − 48 = 8. Cup 5: 60 − 56 = 4.
  3. Cup 6: 60 − 60 = 0. TU is at its maximum (point of satiety).
  4. Cup 7: 56 − 60 = −4. MU is negative, so TU falls.
Answer

MU = 20, 16, 12, 8, 4, 0, −4. MU falls with each cup; TU is highest (60) when MU = 0.

Worked example 2: equilibrium with two goods (equi-marginal principle)

Problem

A student has Rs. 500. Good X costs Rs. 100 and good Y costs Rs. 50. MU of units 1-5 of X: 500, 400, 300, 200, 100. MU of units 1-6 of Y: 300, 250, 200, 150, 100, 50. Find the best combination.

Working
  1. MU per rupee for X (÷ 100): 5, 4, 3, 2, 1. For Y (÷ 50): 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1.
  2. Spend each rupee where MU per rupee is highest, until income runs out.
  3. At X = 3 and Y = 4: MUx/Px = 300 ÷ 100 = 3 and MUy/Py = 150 ÷ 50 = 3. Equal. ✓
  4. Spending = 3 × 100 + 4 × 50 = 300 + 200 = Rs. 500. All income used. ✓
  5. TU = (500 + 400 + 300) + (300 + 250 + 200 + 150) = 1,200 + 900 = 2,100 utils.
  6. Check other affordable bundles: X = 2, Y = 6 gives 900 + 1,050 = 1,950; X = 4, Y = 2 gives 1,400 + 550 = 1,950. Both lower.
Answer

Buy 3 units of X and 4 units of Y. MU per rupee is equal (3 = 3) and TU is at its highest, 2,100 utils.

Worked example 3: deriving the individual demand curve

Problem

In example 2, the price of X falls from Rs. 100 to Rs. 50. Income (Rs. 500), Py (Rs. 50) and the MU schedules stay the same. How much X is bought now?

Working
  1. New MU per rupee for X (÷ 50): 10, 8, 6, 4, 2. For Y it is still 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1.
  2. X is now better value, so the consumer buys more of it.
  3. At X = 5 and Y = 5: MUx/Px = 100 ÷ 50 = 2 and MUy/Py = 100 ÷ 50 = 2. Equal. ✓
  4. Spending = 5 × 50 + 5 × 50 = 250 + 250 = Rs. 500. ✓
  5. Two points on the demand curve for X: (Rs. 100, 3 units) and (Rs. 50, 5 units).
Answer

When Px falls from Rs. 100 to Rs. 50, quantity of X rises from 3 to 5. Joining such points gives a downward-sloping demand curve.

From marginal utility to the demand curve

Assumptions and limits of utility analysis

  • Units must be of standard size and consumed continuously, with no change in taste or income.
  • Utility cannot really be measured in numbers; people can only rank their choices.
  • The marginal utility of money is assumed constant, which is unrealistic when prices or income change a lot.
  • It cannot separate the income effect from the substitution effect of a price change.
  • These weaknesses led to the indifference curve (ordinal) approach.
In Sri Lankan business

Buffet restaurants and hotel offers such as 'second item half price' work because of diminishing marginal utility: the next plate or the second item gives less satisfaction, so it must be cheaper to attract the buyer. Marketers at firms like Cargills use the same idea for multi-buy discounts.

Exam angle

Short answer: “State the law of diminishing marginal utility.” As a consumer takes more units of a good in a given period, other things equal, the marginal utility of each extra unit falls.

Structured question: “With Rs. 500, Px = Rs. 100 and Py = Rs. 50 and given MU schedules, find the consumer's equilibrium combination.” Compute MU per rupee for each good; the combination X = 3, Y = 4 equates MUx/Px = MUy/Py = 3 and spends all Rs. 500.

Essay: “Explain consumer equilibrium for two goods using marginal utility analysis, and derive the individual demand curve.” State the law of DMU with a table, the equi-marginal condition, work a numerical case, show how a price fall raises quantity, and note the limits of the approach.

Remember it

Equal bang for every buck: MUx/Px = MUy/Py. If one ratio is higher, buy more of that good until the ratios meet.