haya.Learning made clear
Unit VI · Limited companies and ratio analysis
12 min readConcept sheetOften a 10-mark calculation with comments

Ratio analysis II: liquidity, gearing and investor ratios

Liquidity ratios test short-term debt-paying ability; gearing shows reliance on borrowed funds; investor ratios such as EPS and P/E show returns per share.

Current ratioCurrent assets ÷ current liabilities
Quick ratio(Current assets − inventory) ÷ current liabilities
GearingDebt ÷ (debt + equity) × 100
EPS(Profit − preference dividend) ÷ ordinary shares

Liquidity, gearing and investor formulas

RatioFormulaWhat it tells you
Current ratioCurrent assets ÷ current liabilitiesAbility to pay short-term debts
Quick (acid test) ratio(Current assets − inventory) ÷ current liabilitiesLiquidity without relying on selling inventory
GearingLong-term debt ÷ (long-term debt + equity) × 100Share of long-term funds that is borrowed
Debt to equityLong-term debt ÷ equity × 100Borrowing compared with owners' funds
Interest coverPBIT ÷ interestHow many times profit covers interest
Earnings per share (EPS)(Profit for the year − preference dividend) ÷ number of ordinary sharesProfit earned for each ordinary share
Price/earnings (P/E) ratioMarket price per share ÷ EPSHow many years of earnings investors pay for
Dividend per share (DPS)Ordinary dividends for the year ÷ number of ordinary sharesCash return per share
Dividend coverEPS ÷ DPSHow safely profit covers the dividend
Dividend yieldDPS ÷ market price × 100Cash return on the share price

Worked example 1: liquidity and gearing of Serendib Foods PLC

Problem

From the 2026 statements (Rs. '000): current assets 33,000, of which inventory 13,000; current liabilities 15,000; 12% debentures 25,000; total equity 83,500, of which preference shares 10,000; operating profit (PBIT) 26,000; finance costs 3,000.

Working
  1. Current ratio: 33,000 ÷ 15,000 = 2.2 : 1.
  2. Quick ratio: (33,000 − 13,000) ÷ 15,000 = 20,000 ÷ 15,000 = 1.33 : 1.
  3. Gearing: 25,000 ÷ (25,000 + 83,500) × 100 = 25,000 ÷ 108,500 × 100 = 23.0%.
  4. Debt to equity: 25,000 ÷ 83,500 × 100 = 29.9%.
  5. Interest cover: 26,000 ÷ 3,000 = 8.7 times.
  6. If preference shares are treated as prior-charge capital: (25,000 + 10,000) ÷ 108,500 × 100 = 32.3%.
Answer

Current ratio 2.2 : 1, quick ratio 1.33 : 1, gearing 23.0% (32.3% if preference shares count as debt), interest cover 8.7 times: a liquid, low-geared company.

Worked example 2: investor ratios

Problem

Serendib Foods: profit for the year Rs. 18,500,000; preference dividend Rs. 1,000,000; 4,000,000 ordinary shares; ordinary dividends for the year Rs. 1.50 interim + Rs. 2.00 final per share; market price Rs. 52.50 per share.

Working
  1. EPS: (18,500,000 − 1,000,000) ÷ 4,000,000 = 17,500,000 ÷ 4,000,000 = Rs. 4.375, about Rs. 4.38.
  2. DPS: 1.50 + 2.00 = Rs. 3.50.
  3. Dividend cover: 4.375 ÷ 3.50 = 1.25 times.
  4. P/E ratio: 52.50 ÷ 4.375 = 12 times.
  5. Dividend yield: 3.50 ÷ 52.50 × 100 = 6.7%.
  6. Payout ratio: 3.50 ÷ 4.375 × 100 = 80%.
Answer

EPS Rs. 4.38, DPS Rs. 3.50, dividend cover 1.25 times, P/E 12, dividend yield 6.7%. Paying out 80% of earnings leaves little profit for growth.

Reading the liquidity ratios

A traditional rule of thumb is a current ratio of about 2 : 1 and a quick ratio of about 1 : 1, but the right level depends on the industry. Supermarkets that sell for cash and turn inventory quickly can work safely with much lower ratios, while a manufacturer with slow-moving stock needs more. A ratio that is too high can also be a warning: cash, inventory or receivables may be lying idle instead of earning a return.

High gearing: good or bad?

AdvantagesDebt interest is fixed, so in good years more profit is left for shareholders. Owners keep control, because lenders do not vote.
RisksInterest must be paid even in bad years; shareholders' profits swing more widely; lenders may refuse more credit; in the worst case the company may fail.

Compare gearing with similar companies: businesses with heavy fixed assets, such as power and telecom companies, often carry more debt than retailers.

Limitations of ratio analysis

  • Ratios use past, year-end figures that may not represent the whole year.
  • Different accounting policies (inventory, depreciation) make comparisons unfair.
  • Inflation distorts comparisons over time.
  • Window dressing near the year end can flatter liquidity.
  • Ratios show symptoms, not causes; read them with non-financial information.
  • Horizontal (trend) analysis and vertical (common-size) analysis help put ratios in context.
In Sri Lankan business

Investors on the Colombo Stock Exchange compare EPS, P/E and dividend yield before buying shares, and banks check gearing and interest cover before lending more. Listed companies' published annual reports give all the figures needed.

Exam angle

Short answer: “What does the quick ratio measure?” The ability to pay current liabilities from current assets other than inventory: (current assets − inventory) ÷ current liabilities.

Structured question: “Calculate EPS, the P/E ratio, dividend cover and dividend yield from the given data.” EPS after preference dividends, then P/E = price ÷ EPS, cover = EPS ÷ DPS, yield = DPS ÷ price × 100, with a one-line comment on each.

Essay: “Calculate and comment on the liquidity, gearing and investor ratios of a company, and state the limitations of ratio analysis.” Ratios with workings, comments on liquidity, financial risk and investor returns, then four or five limitations.

Remember it

Liquidity: current and quick. Gearing: debt ÷ (debt + equity). Investors: EPS → P/E; DPS → cover and yield. Always deduct preference dividends before calculating EPS.